[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
Subject: FM's place at Adobe
From: Lindsey Thomas Martin <lindseym@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:58:45 -0800
Cc: tcole@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Here are some extracts from a thread (If Word can do it ...) from Blueworld's Indesign list that shows how one person, at least, at Adobe views FrameMaker. If such a perception is wide-spread at Adobe, one does not have to look much further to see why the re-packaging called FrameMaker 6.0 has not addressed any of the long-standing typesetting deficiencies and malfunctions in FM. Lindsey Martin >PCJ wrote on 3/18/00 4:21 AM: > >> Even MSWord can make a table. I guess that about says it all. > >Unfortunately it doesn't. It's comparing apples and oranges (or apples and >rubber bands). I've explained this before on this list, but I'll do it one >more time. > >Put in simple terms, the way that word or document processors like Word and >FrameMaker approach document structure is very, very different from that of >a more free-form layout tool like InDesign, XPress, Illustrator, FreeHand, >PageMaker, etc. > >Tim Cole >tcole@adobe.com >Craig Faichney wrote on 3/18/00 12:33 PM: > >> It's curious that FM is lumped in with Word. Is it structurally more akin >> to Word than as a "free form" layout app? > > >Yes, you got it...and so is Ventura... > > >Tim Cole >tcole@adobe.com ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **