[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [New search]

Re: Getting rid of Doctype declaration header?



Thx Lynne for clearing that up
At 01:13 PM 8/4/99 -0700, Lynne A. Price wrote:
>At 11:55 PM 8/2/99 -0700, Dan Emory wrote:
>>At 04:33 PM 8/2/99 -0700, Lynne A. Price wrote:
>>>  One shortcoming you did not mention is that there is no provision
>>>for inherited exceptions on import.
>>=====================================================
>>How about an example of what you mean by "inherited exceptions"?
>>===============================================================
>
>"Exception" is an SGML term that (pun intended) includes both
>inclusions and exclusions. So if you have, say, a Chapter element
>with a general rule like Title, Para+, Section* and an inclusion
>of IndexTerm, then any Section in a Chapter can include IndexTerm
>elements. However, when FrameMaker+SGML processes a fragment
>consisting of a Section, it has no way of knowing that that Section
>is intended for use within a Chapter and hence does not permit
>IndexTerms. 
>
>If you have this situation, you can:
>
>1) Change the EDD to specify explicitly in general rules where the
>   "inclusions" are permitted
>
>2) Avoid using fragments
>
>	--Lynne
>
>Lynne A. Price
>Text Structure Consulting, Inc.
>lprice@txstruct.com
>http://www.txstruct.com
>
>
     ====================
     | Nullius in Verba |
     ====================
Dan Emory, Dan Emory & Associates
FrameMaker/FrameMaker+SGML Document Design & Database Publishing
Voice/Fax: 949-722-8971 E-Mail: danemory@primenet.com
10044 Adams Ave. #208, Huntington Beach, CA 92646
---Subscribe to the "Free Framers" list by sending a message to
   majordomo@omsys.com with "subscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.


** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **