[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [New search]

RE: Adobe FrameMaker End-of-Life for Macintosh Platform



I'm sure there will be a bunch of "me too" messages on this one! Dov is
one of the most significant contributors to this list, and has been a
tremendous resource for many of us. His assistance goes far beyond
anything we could get from Adobe technical support, and we certainly get
answers more quickly! I have an email filter for his messages -- they go
directly into a folder with his name, and I've forwarded a number of his
posts to people on this list over the past several years. Thanks Dov for
your years of dedication!!

In my opinion, Denise Salles doesn't know what she's talking about.

Deb


> Denise,
> 
> Thank you for your feedback.
> 
> You are certainly entitled to your opinion vis-a-vis my style and 
> motivation. Other recipients and contributors to this list may or
> may not share those opinions.
> 
> In terms of the particular message you cite, I was simply stating the 
> technical facts to counter a number of messages on this list 
> by well-meaning
> contributors. These messages have taken some terrible leaps of faith 
> regarding what could have or should be done for a "quick fix" 
> for FrameMaker
> on the Macintosh, more specifically MacOS X, on the basis of 
> their buying
> into popular hype vis-a-vis OS similarities and portability issues.
> 
> Unlike some contributors to this list over the last week, I have not
> questioned anyone's motives, intelligence, etc. Nor have I tried to
> convince anyone that last week's announcement was good and wonderful.
> My style is terse. I am not a "suit" or a PR wonk, just a 
> dumb engineer
> here at Adobe (and not even part of the FrameMaker 
> organization) trying to
> supply technical answers to what are usually print workflow and system
> configuration issues. The terseness is a direct reaction to 
> (a) needing to
> keep the messages as short and sweet as possible and (b) 
> wanting to avoid
> editorializing as much as possible. With 300 to 600 incoming 
> emails a day 
> (after the spam filters), I really don't have time to craft 
> namby-pamby 
> responses to make everyone feel good. This isn't "USA Today" or 
> "People Magazine." 
> 
> May I humbly suggest that if you really dislike my contributions to
> this list that much and find them to be of no use to you, you 
> simply set
> your email filters to automatically discard all email with 
> isaacs@xxxxxxxxx
> in them.
> 
>         - Dov
> 
> 
> At 3/30/2004 10:34 AM, Denise Salles wrote:
> >Dov,
> >
> >In my opinion your messages are, as a general rule, 
> contemptuous and condescending. Come down from the bell tower 
> if you truly want open communication with others.
> >
> >Denise



** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **