[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Long, Michael" <Michael.Long@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Graphics quality--book vs file
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:25:26 -0800
Cc: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
In-reply-to: <200403100049.i2A0n42A053475@omsys.com>
References: <200403100049.i2A0n42A053475@omsys.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
The only "settings" that would make any difference for this would be the distillation joboptions in terms of downsampling and/or compression of images. I suspect that you are using a different process to generate the PDF for a "book" versus for the individual files. Exactly how are you generating PDF and how are you specifying distillation joboptions? - Dov At 3/9/2004 03:39 PM, Long, Michael wrote: >All, > >Screen shots in one of our manuals, when it's PDFed at the book level,come >out of the printer equally muddy/smeary, regardless of their formats which >are mostly gif and bmp. But when files in the book are PDFed individually, >the screen shots come out of the printer the way they're supposed to. >Distiller settings the same for both. We're so far unable to find any >setting at the book level that might have been turned on or off >accidentally. Screen shots in the other manuals print OK from PDF, same >Distiller settings etc. > >The release of the doc is imminent and we don't have time to research this >in the archives. I haven't found any clues in the FM manuals. Is there >anyone out there who has experienced this who can provide an answer? > >I'm on digest, so a copy to me directly would be appreciated. > >Thanks, >Mike > >Mike Long ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **