[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Böðvar Björgvinsson <bodvar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TT vs Type1 and OT. [Was: RE: Frame 6.0 on XP--does not work for me!!!]
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:43:46 -0800
Cc: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <LISTMANAGER-25396-12011-2002.12.18-09.10.19--isaacs#adobe.com@lists.FrameUsers.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Bodvar, (1) I know of no reason why Arial would not be suitable for printing in small point sizes, assuming you like the style of the font. It renders fairly well, even at 6pt on a 600dpi device, certainly no worse than Adobe's Type 1 Helvetica at the same size with the same resolution. (2) What OpenType is "all about" is interoperability and simplicity. First of all, OpenType fonts may contain either bezier curve font character outline descriptions (like Type 1 fonts) or quadratic curve font character outline descriptions (like TrueType fonts). Unlike the older Type 1 fonts but similar to TrueType fonts, OpenType fonts are totally self-contained in a single file containing the font character outlines, character metrics, kerning data, plus data associated with advanced formatting functions such as those available with InDesign. An OpenType font is totally cross-platform compatible. There is no "Mac version" that hides its data in a "resource fork" that is invisible under Windows. Just copy back and forth between systems. (3) Again, we don't know what you are talking about in terms of "older TT are problematic in some ways." - Dov At 12/18/2002 08:09 AM, Böðvar Björgvinsson wrote: >Hi Dov, > >Thanks for this enlightening lecture. > >I really thought that it was the OpenType that bridged the "outdated" TT. I have been refraining from TT as much as I can because of these old doctrines, although I have not had any serious problems with them (apart from that Arial is originally created as a screen font -- I heard -- and is not suitable for printing in small font size). > >Just out of curiousity: What was the OpenType all about then? Is the fact not that OpenType is the new version of TT that finally behaves and older TT still are problematic in some ways? > >However my worst problems have been with PS fonts, but that is another story. > >Best regards, > >Bodvar ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **