[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: InDesign: Summary
From: smurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 8:26:35 -0500
Receipt-Requested-To: smurphy@softworkscc.com
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
I received a surprising volume of mail in response to my query about InDesign, Adobe's new DTP product. Several people asked me to post a summary, so here it is. - From a source in the know: InDesign is aimed at a high-end market: "it's target market is magazine publishers, design studios, and advertising agencies. If you're looking for a serious powerhouse, this is it. If you don't need that much power, I'd look at PageMaker 6.5 Plus." - Everyone indicated that the package is enormously powerful in certain areas (particularly text handling), but lacks certain things we think of as very basic, such as generated lists (ToC, Index), and even tables. I saw this in one of Adobe's white papers on the product too. They had a reason (excuse) for this but I was not convinced, personally. (As an aside, I was equally unimpressed when I first looked at FrameMaker a few years ago. The Adobe rep claimed that the absence of many features, such as the capability [back then] to sort tables and so forth was deliberate, to allow third parties to step in and take the lead. The real problem was that the reps were trying to sell FM in terms of its "features," such as the ability to wrap text around graphics, which did not stack up favorably even to WordPerfect, instead of showing FM's singular value for authors of long documents and structured information. I had to actually buy and start using FM before I understood this.) - All who had used it said InDesign is very stable and well- engineered, but a resource hog. I'm used to that with everything, these days... - Several people suggested that I ask Adobe to set up a local demo of InDesign in the Washington DC area, and informed me that this was happening (as Kay Ethier announced) in other areas such as Research Triangle Park. Good idea. Anyone from Adobe listening? - Two people challenged my quick dismissal of FrameMaker as a tool for producing newsletters. They made good arguments, and I am going to re-visit this. I am so used to doing the "user manual" thing that I had almost forgotten about FM's ability to handle multiple flows and so forth. I took a second look at the amazing templates by Valiulis & Wasson on the Adobe website, and was humbled by them. There is a lot more power and room for creativity in FM than I had given it credit for. However, I have to say that the product doesn't offer much help in doing this. - There is a lot more information on Adobe's web site for anyone else who is interested in InDesign. Steve Murphy MURPHUS 7138 Tolliver Street Alexandria, VA 22306 (703) 765-7320 sdm@murphus.com http:www.murphus.com Steve Murphy Senior Documentation Specialist Adobe Certified Expert/FrameMaker, Acrobat SOFTWORKS, Inc. 5845 Richmond Highway Alexandria, VA 22303 USA (703) 317-8879 smurphy@softworkscc.com "Witty quote to show my erudition, sense of humor, and overall brilliance." --Someone Famous ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **