[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "'framers@xxxxxxxxx'" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Straight-through v. chapter folios [was 'RE: chapter-based page numbering...']
From: "Hedley Finger (EPA)" <Hedley.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 09:33:19 +1000
Importance: high
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Other factors to consider when deciding whether to implement straight-through or chapter-by-chapter folios: STRAIGHT THROUGH @ Roman numerals for front-matter are a holdover from letterpress printing to allow the body of the book to be made up into pages and printed before the full pagination was known for compiling the table of Contents. It also allowed a worthy sponsor to read the page proofs before contributing a preface of unknown length. Since laser printers, imagesetters, and litho, you can now repaginate the book in a trice, so you should folio straight-through. @ Straight-through folios simplify the conversion to PDF. @ Readers have a kinetic feel for foliation, for example, 'I've flipped over 7 mm of paper so I should be somewhere near page 65'. If you have many cross-references it is easier for the reader to flip pages while keeping an eye on the changing folio number in the corner of the page. @ Straight-through should not be used with tabbed dividers (card chapter separators). Reason: you can't flip when the book is broken up by protruding tabs. CHAPTER FOLIOS @ Use when you intend to insert tabbed chapter dividers. The reader can quickly follow a cross-reference by, first, locating the chapter tab and, second, flipping to the required page. @ Do not use without tabbed dividers. The reason is that the reader has lost the kinetic feel for how far through the book he or she is. It is easy to flip past a very short chapter and then have to rewind or fast forward to converge on the target page. It is much harder to flip pages and read and process a double- barrelled folio: '12-67'. @ Chapter folios are justified if you are maintaining a loose-leaf reference and issuing change pages or change chapters. Then, all you have to do is issue a new chapter, ToC, LoF, LoT, and index. -- Regards, Hedley Finger Technical Writer Ericsson Australia Pty Ltd StarHUB NMOSS Project Level 34.66 Melbourne Central Tower 360 Elizabeth Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia Tel. +61 3 9301 6214 Cell. +61 412 461 558 Fax. +61 3 9301 6199 Email. hedley.finger@ericsson.com.au Hand Holding Projects Pty Ltd 28 Regent Street Burwood VIC 3125 Australia Tel. +61 3 9809 1229 Cell. +61 412 461 558 Fax. +61 3 9809 1326 Email. hfinger@handholding.com.au > I wouldn't change the numbering scheme to match the PDF. I think most > users > of technical manuals are used to chapter-based numbering. > > Regarding chapter-based numbering, here are a couple of advantages (there > are probably more, and I'm sure someone will come up with a disadvangate > or > two as well): > > o It can be faster to find things as there are fewer pages to leaf thru. > Jump to the chapter, then to the page. > > o When adding or changing pages, you need to update the TOC for that > chapter only, not the whole book. > > Dick Gaskill > > _________________________________________________________________________ ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **