Re: Getting rid of Doctype declaration header?

["Lynne A. Price" <lprice@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 11:55 PM 8/2/99 -0700, Dan Emory wrote:
>>  If you declare SGMLFragment in your EDD, you can use any
>>general rule/inclusions/exclusions that are appropriate to your
>>situation; <ANY> is merely the general rule used on import as a default.
>========================================================================
>But any such modification to the general rule would defeat the intended
>purpose of the SGMLFragment element, namely that it is used to import any
>SGML fragment, no matter what it's structure. Since FM+SGML allows the use
>of only one element (which must have the name SGMLFragment) for this
>purpose, it seems to me you're stuck with a general rule of <ANY>.


The intended purpose of the SGMLFragment element type, like that of any
other element type in my EDD/DTD, is to be used as I intend. If I plan
on using SGMLFragments that conform to a particular structure, I can
certainly define the SGMLFragment element in a way that suggests the
intended structure to my users.

	--Lynne

Lynne A. Price
Text Structure Consulting, Inc.
lprice@txstruct.com
http://www.txstruct.com


** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **