[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Duplicate Messages
From: jeremy@xxxxxxxxx (Jeremy H. Griffith)
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 17:45:07 GMT
Cc: Brad Anderson <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <373BB995.CA7D692C@ind.tansu.com.au>
Organization: Omni Systems, Inc.
References: <373BB995.CA7D692C@ind.tansu.com.au>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 14 May 1999 15:50:13 +1000, Michael Richards <michaelr@ind.tansu.com.au> wrote: >Am I alone in getting a number of duplicate messages this week? Usually >the duplicate arrives along with its identical twin at about the same >time. Sometimes ANOTHER duplicate message (this must be the evil twin >from an alternate universe) arrives 24 hrs later. That, or The Matrix >has developed another bug. > >I have taken a few days to point this out to the list because I was >waiting for someone else to point this out and because of my admiration >for the impeccable job Jeremy has performed until now, but the horrible >thought has dawned upon me that even he may be unaware of this stain his >escutcheon. Alas, Jeremy *has* seen it... but it is beyond his ability to correct. The repeated copy of the message, if you look at the bottom of it, is always from the framers@frameusers.com list. The problem is that when people cross-post, and put framers@omsys.com on the Cc: line, the post goes to the omsys.com list *twice*, once when it is originally mailed, and again *from frameusers.com* when it appears on the other Framers list... So if you subscribe to both lists, you get a total of three copies. Yuck. One fix would be to have frameusers.com *not* send to the Cc's. This is in fact how majordomo works, and is the rule for list software; the message has *always* already gone to its Cc's, why send it again? I do not know if Brad can make such a setting with his software, though. It may well be beyond his power too. The Right Way would be for cross-posters to put *both* list names in the "To:" field, leaving the "Cc:" field *blank*. That way, each list will see only its own address, and the problem goes away. So, I'd very much appreciate it if everyone would do it that way, when they feel that cross-posting is appropriate in the first place... >And those escutcheons are so hard to clean, too! ;-) >Anyway, no great tragedy if this proves to be difficult to fix, but >thought I'd point it out in case. Thanks for raising the issue! -- Jeremy H. Griffith, at Omni Systems Inc. (jeremy@omsys.com) http://www.omsys.com/ ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **