[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Kevin McLauchlan <KMcLauchlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: InDesign and Frame
From: Tom Regner <tom_regner@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 08:33:37 -0800
CC: "'Adam Korman'" <adamk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>, Framers2 <framers@xxxxxxxxx>, Framers <framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: N.E.T. http://www.net.com
References: <9496F0C2840FD211891400104B9DF96D174AAE@NTSERVER2>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Here in the Silicon Valley, any technical writer worth his or her salt has to know FrameMaker, and know it fairly well. Nearly all companies, big or small, are currently using FrameMaker for their manuals. Sure, there is some resistance within some Engineering environments, for example, where the need for robust, large-document software is poorly understood, but in such cases I simply send them the "Word-vs-Frame" PDF file that someone pointed to on these list some months back and it invariably stops the argument in its tracks. As with any major software, the people who learn it will creeb and complain about its shortcomings, but let's face it, there is no substitute for FrameMaker, and from what I gather, Adobe knows this. It might not be the cash cow they'd hoped for, but that's partly a marketing problem in that Adobe seems reluctant to compare FM directly with other document creation programs, especially the Fisher-Price inspired MS Word. Two steps forward, one step back. 'Twas ever thus. In the meantime, any technical writer around these parts who goes online or searches ads for writers from any source will see FrameMaker expertise as an ubiquitous prerequisite for gainful employment. That can't be a bad thing, can it? -- Tom (A copiously edited) Kevin McLauchlan wrote: > I'm currently using FrameMaker for exactly one reason: > Before this little company decided they needed a full-time > techy writer, their most frequently contracted writer happened > to use FM. > > That's it. Period. If not for that, I'd be using Word and asking > for Ventura. FrameMaker is practically an underground cult fetish, > invisible to those who don't already know the passwords and > the secret handshake. > > Given the intensity and visibility with which Adobe markets all > its other products, the FrameMaker vacuum is absolutely > pregnant with meaning. The inescapable conclusion to draw, > from the fact that one needs to DIG to find mention of Frame > on the Adobe web site, is that we should all be stepping up our > efforts to find a replacement/successor product. FM version 6 > is an unlikelihood, looking for a place not to happen. ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **