[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "'Dina Davidson'" <DinaD@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'ff'" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>, "'framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: conditional text question
From: "Banttari, Ananda" <Ananda_Banttari@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:16:15 -0600
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Dina says: > it seems that I can't add a conditon to a specific *column* in a > table - only to a row. Frame says: "Select complete row(s) before applying condition tags." Ugh. I thought of one work-around, but it's not exactly what I'd call elegant... Make multiple tables. Each one has one of your sets of conditional columns plus all of the non-conditional columns. For the non-conditional columns, the cell contents are set up as cross-references to the "master" table. (If you have lots of these, name them some unusual paragraph format to find them more easily in the xref dialog.) Then select the table markers and conditionalize those. This work-around presumes that the conditional text takes up quite a bit of space. The other work-around is to keep all the variant conditions in one column, marking the various "phrases" condi- tionally. Ick. 'Course, you could re-design your table to make the columns into rows and vice-versa -- I suspect that's what the Adobe programming team had in mind, without considering that sometimes that just does *not* work well. RFE, anyone??? (And how about one to *exclude* text if it has a specific condition set? And one to say, include text if it is marked A, but do *not* include it if it is also marked B? I could go on.... ;-7 ) --Ananda Banttari Tech. Doc. Specialist, SDS ananda@sdsi.com ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **