[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Dan Emory <danemory@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Database Publishing with FrameMaker
From: Bill Briggs <web@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 12:35:45 -0300
Cc: Free Framers <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <2.2.16.19981002172928.5db72d1e@pop.primenet.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
>Stability is the absolute first essential ingredient for successful database >publishing, where very large files and books are the norm. I find it's also essential if I'm going to keep my hair. The instability of newer Frame versions is a real aggravation after version 4 (that only crashed once n me in two years of daily use, and that was when it tried to import a corrupt .xwd file). >It might interest you to know that, for database publishing, I'm still using >FM+SGML V5.1.1 on a Windows 3.1 platform, I still have a kind of perverse fondness for Windows 3.11. You can still tinker under the hood, something they made a more challenging in Win9x. Is there a Mac version of UniMerge? Or one that will run on Linux? I'm intrigued that it works without the need for the SGML package (although like you, that's what I have). We've looked at this, but have not acted because there's never the time to properly address it and some people don't understand how it might be of benefit. >Win9x/NT, as well as Unix platforms. Although UniMerge can (theoretically at >least) be used with structured documents Is the database from which it would extract this information an SGML elements database, or not? If this is a stupid question I'm sorry. Database publishing is not part of my area of expertise. >The reason I haven't moved up to FM+SGML V5.5.x is that I tried, and found >that the new version was meta-unstable for database publishing applications. >I was a Beta test site for FM+SGML 5.5, and discovered during the Beta phase >that it was unreliable. When the released version came out, the problems >were still there, and have remained there through the first three bug >releases. Explains why bugs bug you. >a Win3.1 platform for database publishing, but at this point, I have no >choice. I can't move up to Win9x/NT until ... I'm partly joking, but is 9x a move up from 3.11? I'd bet 3.11 is really fast on todays hardware. - web ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **