[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Free Framers <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Database Publishing with FrameMaker
From: Dan Emory <danemory@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 17:30:09 -0700 (MST)
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Stability is the absolute first essential ingredient for successful database publishing, where very large files and books are the norm. It might interest you to know that, for database publishing, I'm still using FM+SGML V5.1.1 on a Windows 3.1 platform, even though UniMerge also runs on Win9x/NT, as well as Unix platforms. Although UniMerge can (theoretically at least) be used with structured documents, I don't use it that way for database publishing. The reason I use FM+SGML V5.1.1 rather than FrameMaker V5.1.1 is that FM+SGML is far more stable than FrameMaker, even for unstructured documents, and seems to do a much better job of releasing memory. The reason I haven't moved up to FM+SGML V5.5.x is that I tried, and found that the new version was meta-unstable for database publishing applications. I was a Beta test site for FM+SGML 5.5, and discovered during the Beta phase that it was unreliable. When the released version came out, the problems were still there, and have remained there through the first three bug releases. As you probably know, Adobe never put out a logo-compliant FM+SGML 5.1.2 release for use with WIN95/NT, so I'm stuck. I don't really want to stay on a Win3.1 platform for database publishing, but at this point, I have no choice. I can't move up to Win9x/NT until Adobe cleans up the bugs in FM+SGML 5.5.x. My dilemma explains, to a large degree, the harshness of my criticism of the V5.5 release on the Framers list. A successful software product must be scalable--stability at the small document level doesn't prove much about its scalability. The V5.5 release fails in large-scale environments for both structured and unstructured documents. Yet that's the kind of environment that is typical in the big license-holders, who are the backbone of the market for Frame products. If they begin to desert FrameMaker, its demise is certain, and we all lose. One of the shortcomings of the Brad Framers list is that there are very few active participants from the big license holders. We need their viewpoint, and it might be worthwhile to recruit them to join and actively participate on New Framers. Dan Emory Dan Emory & Associates FrameMaker/FrameMaker+SGML Document Design and Database Publishing Specialists Voice/Fax: 949-722-8971 E-Mail: danemory@primenet.com 10044 Adams Ave. #208 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **