[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Free Framers <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: List Protocols - first cut
From: dhays@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 11:08:35 -0400
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
I too would not want to be *rules" happy. Let's consider the element of a Frame users community where, from time to time, there is going to be griping about the product. And there is also going to be ideas that may, or may not, be considered market research. If we exist as a community, albeit a Free-Framers community, then we must consider that this is part of our expression- -that the free interchange of discourse may take any direction. I'm not saying that we should be without any rules, but I firmly believe we must be diligent and create the rules around those posts that are openly hostile, get so far off topic that any relationship between the post and the intent of Free Framers is beyond recognition, or that the intent of any posting is to use this forum as an advertising medium (be careful here----IMO, the introduction of a new product/service should be welcome as we can add that post to our own tools, but to use this forum as a medium to sell an existing product denigrates the usefulness of the list). ...my 2 small units of currency... Dennis Robin Clark <rmclark@danielind.com> on 10/01/98 10:52:24 AM To: Free Framers <framers@omsys.com> cc: (bcc: Dennis Hays/ALBANY/NOVALIS) Subject: RE: List Protocols - first cut Upon first read, looks good. I need to let everything perculate before responding in a more detailed way. A couple additional ideas: * Would we want to allow/consider queries WRT developing a new product for FM? I am recalling posts to the "Brad List" where a Framer-Developer would suggest creating a 3rd party tool and thus elicit the group's opinion as to its feasibility. Yes, it is essentially market research. Do we want to deal with that? * Likewise, do we want guidelines for posts that discuss potential feature enhancements or gripes in general? Something reasonably inclusive, like "discussions of potential feature enhancements and general gripes should maintain a constructive purpose beyond the poster's initial frustration"? Reason being: posters can, er, commiserate off-line but constructive brain-storming should be fostered. I must admit I am leary of becoming too Rules-Happy, but I thought the above inicidents might be good to consider. R ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **