[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: waynefb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Workflow
From: "Fred Ridder" <docudoc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:29:15 -0400
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
In-reply-to: <4447524.1117570886777.JavaMail.root@wamui-sweet.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
My opionions only; I don't speak for Intel Fred Ridder Intel Parsippany, NJ
From: waynefb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Reply-To: waynefb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To: framers@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Workflow Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:21:26 -0400 (EDT)
First off, many thanks to everybody who has commented on this. We are being forced to do something we don't want and we're trying to make the best of our situation. Just so people know, the thought was to use CVS which would only give them a copy of the original to work on. The reviewers would never be able to commit their changes and override the original. This is being requested by individuals very high up on the "food chain", thus there is little we can do to change that. However, it behooves us to make this situation work for both parties, thus I'm going to investigate how Acrobat 7 professional deals with this (I currently only have the standard version), and the MIF2GO option since they mentioned the ability to use MS Word.
Anyhow, this has been very enlightening and I wanted to thank everybody for their thoughts on the matter.
BTW, I realize that paper copies do work best for a majority of the engineers that I work with, but since I have people on three continents to work with, that isn't going to work well for me.
Regards, Wayne
** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **