[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Free Framers <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: FM Replacement Future
From: James Eric Lawson <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:19:57 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
I've been investigating replacements for FM lately, and am entertaining various options. All of the options entail trade-offs. Note that I'm concerned immediately with scientific articles, books, and website publications, along with the usual word-processing applications (letters, memos, etc.). This means my focus is on the expedient creation and maintenance of documents rich in equations and graphics, but such features as indexing and conditional display are also important. My choice will have to be useful with minimal training and support by secretaries, temporary workers and brain-dead Ph.D.'s alike. Also, I think the open source model is likely to become the only viable model for software development, which is to say that I'm heavily biased toward open source tools, but will consider any tool that stores output in non-proprietary open standard formats (e.g., XML/XSL/CSS), so as to obviate many of the problems associated with conversion of legacy documents. The options I've been considering include OpenOffice (good prospect; xml creation with good equation editor, excellent drawing tool, graphing and presentation capabilities; robust development team and outstanding long-term utility prospects; Mac OS, Linux/Unix and Windows). <http://www.openoffice.org/> Publicon (another good prospect, but definitely oriented toward scientific publications; not open source; excellent equation editor; would need to use third party drawing tools; only Linux and Windows so far, although a Mac OS version is reputed to be in the offing). <http://www.wolfram.com/products/publicon/index.html> LaTeX and friends (not so good; too much training and support needed; would need to use third party drawing tools; the big three platforms are supported). See also Scientific Word <http://www.mackichan.com/index.html> and LyX <http://www.lyx.org/>. Serna (this appears to be another good prospect for my needs, but also seems somewhat immature; "True WYSIWYG XML Editor"; would need to use third party equation editor and drawing tool). <http://www.syntext.com/products/serna/index.htm> Scribus (limited prospect; doesn't seem suited to long document production; more similar to PageMaker and Quark than FM; only Linux and Mac OS X). <http://www.scribus.org.uk/> Thus far, it seems that OpenOffice offers the most suitable balance of features and transparency (relative ease of training and support) for my needs, but I suspect many current FM users, who don't commonly use equation editors or integral drawing tools, would be more suited by something like Serna. Clearly though, if the FM user in question thinks MS Word would do the job, albeit clumsily and accompanied by the stench of an open wound, OpenOffice would be the best choice. James Eric Lawson <cire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> System and Network Administrator, Research Publications Editor University of Washington, Box 357962, Seattle WA USA 98195 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't necessarily agree with everything I say. -- Marshal McLuhan I necessarily disagree with everything I say. -- Deputy Dog ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **