[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
Subject: OT: Text editing i PDF
From: Verakso <verakso@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:26:14 +0100
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JPulLDdOSHzXkv2VDmdZN57aVDEdjaFnHMTeIwN5sEbycSIwEKMaof9HnELH/wRbf2r5Wge5KPmHS/QD1gsPhPdm0tl7tD35fubIe1veG+T56LF7c/DoyHGKzQOCJ/TT7AlsHtrk7xujZiVtAb05AVquEAco8By3ZXfYabvWJog=
Reply-to: Verakso <verakso@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Excuse me for this little OT, but this is the only place I know of, and there is some PDF experts her that might have a comment or two on this. As I am working in a Printing House, I am very familiar with customers delivering PDF for print, in fact the whole work flow is ApogeeX PDF based, if someone know this. The PDF received are all with the fonts embedded, which is nice, since it allows us to correct minor typos in the material. Now text editing i Acrobat 4,0 was easy, in 5.0 it could be done but was a bit complicated, but i 6.0 it was rather impossible, even with a tool like PitStop, and i version 7.0 i simply can't be done, unless you already have the font installed on the system (And PitStop isnøt even released in a version that supports 7.0). For obvious reasons this is properly due to various licensing issues between Adobe and font vendors, but removing the possibility to edit text in a PDF with the font embedded, is like saying to a print house like us, that we might as well skip the PDF work flow, and return to the old days, with postscript files, native open documents and the fonts along on a disk. I really can't believe we are the only printers that see this as an issue, on the other hand - perhaps it is because we don't no any loopholes - if there are any. /Thomas ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **