[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Fred Ma <fma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Rumour: FM really is dead
From: Chuck Hastings <cwh2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 18:40:08 -0800
References: <16lusv86vdf4kqop2u37hoq95osllc0l5a@4ax.com> <3FCFE784.5587904B@doe.carleton.ca>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Hello Framers, MSWord driving out FrameMaker is simply one more corollary to Gresham's Law, like Bad software drives out good. How would Adobe feel about the Linux open-software folks creating a free lookalike, to be ready whenever FrameMaker support officially gets deep-sixed, to be called maybe `FlameMaker?' Chuck Hastings cwh2@earthlink.net Vintage Silicon Logic San José and Seattle ========================================= Fred Ma wrote: > The baffling thing is that Adobe doesn't consider FM > worthwhile. How can that be? We live in a capitalist > environment. There is no product (that I know of, not > that I'm any final authority) that even begins to > rival FM for technical composition. (I distinguish > composition from document preparation; for the latter, > the assumption is that the content and approximate > format has been predetermined). How can an application > for which there are no substitutes (not even remotely) > be not worthwhile? Surely, the market for the application > is not small. Alas, I feel the conversation drifting > in the same direction that it has drifted before. It is > because Word has become so cheap that the bean counters > (no respect intended, it is a critical role) have forced > the propeller heads to use Word. Maybe, despite its > awesome functionality, elegance, and stability, the > cost of FM is more than the market can bear. This doesn't > necessarily mean that Adobe is pocketing too much (it > obviously feels that it can't get enough for FM without > giving up market share). It may simply be that continual > development of such a (much better) tool requires too > much resources. > > The argument put forth in the past was that FM's greater > expense more than pays for itself before too long. That > may (or may not) be true. It doesn't matter, so long as > the bean counters don't see that. The market has spoken, > and rightly or wrongly, it will lumber down the path it > has chosen (to the sadness of FM users everywhere). > > Former responses to this topic include the testimony that > FM training courses are alive and well. If so, that is a > welcome relief, since it makes it less likely that FM will > truly be dropped. Whether that testimony is still accurate > today, only the instructors can say. And who knows how > much of any effect that has on the decision of dropping FM. > Who can say what goes on in the minds of the visionaries at > Adobe. > > Fred > > ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** > ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **