[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Rhea Tolman <rhea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Futura fonts
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:03:25 -0700
Cc: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Acrobat NEVER uses a "local font" in lieu of a font of the same name embedded in the PDF file. On the other hand, you can instruct Acrobat to ignore any local fonts for text in a PDF file that is formatted in a font that is not embedded! - Dov At 9/16/2003 08:01 AM, Rhea Tolman wrote: >Futura is a font that has been around for a long time. There are a lot of versions of it out there. In the old days of classical typography, the more-or-less official Mergenthaler version was oversized, meaning that if you set it solid (10 on 10 for example), the ascenders and descenders would touch. The x height and caps height were larger than normal. In the 90s, a "regular" version became available in which the letter size was more usual. > >I've been bitten by this Futura problem before. > >Did you embed the font in the PDF? I thought that if you embedded the font, that the embedded font would always be used for display. Is it possible that Acrobat uses a local font if it finds one, in preference to the embedded one? > >cheers > >Rhea Tolman ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **