[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: <framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Win2k stability (was RE: Recommended OS for FM6)
From: "Richard Combs" <richard.combs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:17:27 -0600
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Thread-Index: AcN4f8uKNpVG2rNNTS6+xjdnIVXnjQABBGcg
Thread-Topic: Recommended OS for FM6
Allen Schaaf wrote: <snip> > I run Frame 7 at work (contracting for IBM) on a W2K machine and > Frame regularly crashes - 3-5 a week. Soft crash, but annoying. > > At home I run both Frame 6 and 7 on 98SE and never (almost) have > a Frame crash or a system crash. </snip> Well, this is totally irrelevant to David Schor's query, since he's asking about which OS to choose for a _new_ computer (Win98 isn't an option). But I can't resist challenging Allen's diss of Win2k. At work, I run Win2k. I don't shut down at night, just log out. Typically, I go at least 30-60 days between reboots. When I do reboot, it's usually to install or update something (I know -- I should be checking for critical security patches more frequently, but...). Heck, during big doc pushes (I just finished one), I typically have FM, PSP, Acrobat, and Distiller all running continuously for a couple of weeks or more, often with 20+ FM files open all the time. Meanwhile, I'm opening and closing Visio, Word, Excel, Project, IE, Outlook, etc., etc., as needed. The last crash was FM on 3/9. I don't recall the circumstances, but I didn't reboot, just restarted FM. No problems since, and only a couple of reboots (to install critical updates). If you're crashing either Win2k or a usually-stable app under Win2k on a regular basis, something's _seriously_ _wrong_ with your system. Allen mentions being a contractor, and contractors frequently get stuck with whatever box is available, often one with a shady past. Was this PC upgraded to Win2k (instead of getting a clean install)? Was it once used as a dev test bed? Is it seriously misconfigured? Could there be hardware problems, such as flaky memory or motherboard? I don't know. But here's what I do know: the idea that Win98, properly configured, is more reliable than Win2k or WinXP, properly configured, is nonsense. "It's my opinion and it's very true." Richard ------ Richard G. Combs Senior Technical Writer Voyant Technologies, Inc. richardDOTcombs AT voyanttechDOTcom 303-223-5111 ------ rgcombs AT freeDASHmarketDOTnet 303-777-0436 ------ ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **