[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "'framers@xxxxxxxxx'" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Missed an update.
From: Ed Treijs <etreijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:44:13 -0400
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
> (1) The "cancel out of FrameMaker installation" hackery associated > with installation of the bundled Distiller ended with FrameMaker 7, > thank goodness. "We" got our point across to the FrameMaker 7 team > (and surprisingly enough, also the PageMaker 7 team -- PageMaker > had the same problem) that the primary product installer should not > bunnystomp all over the user's system. The bundled Distiller 5.0.5 > installer now must be run separately IF the user wants or needs to > run it. Hmm. While I was gone, we upgraded to Frame 7.0 and Acrobat Professional 6.0. The IT person uninstalled our old Frame 5.5.6 and Acrobat 4.0.5 and deleted their directories. When he installed Frame 7 and Acrobat 6, and declined to install Distiller 5 from the Frame 7 package, he noticed that the "Acrobat Distiller" printer was not present. (The installers did notice if there were older/newer versions of Distiller present.) It seems that the printer instance for producing PDF using Distiller 6.0 is now "Adobe PDF" printer--he did not know that. To get the "Acrobat Distiller" printer to appear, he installed Distiller 5.0 as well. So on my system, I have Distiller 5.0 and Acrobat Professional 6.0 (including Distiller 6.0). The installation order was usually Frame 7 before Professional 6, but there were exceptions. How bad is this dual install? Can we just uninstall Distiller 5.0? Or do we need to uninstall the whole shooting match? Final question: when you "Save as PDF" in Frame 7.0, does it matter which printer instance you have selected as your printer? Ed (lots to learn) Treijs ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **