[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Sean Brierley <seanb_us@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Printing 11x17 with crop marks
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:40:12 -0700
Cc: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx
References: <" <LISTMANAGER-35290-8544-2003.08.12-14.05.19--seanb_us#yahoo.com"@lists.FrameUsers.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
At 8/12/2003 01:27 PM, Sean Brierley wrote: >Also, why would a printing service want to use a PPD >other than Adist5.ppd for the PDF that their press >uses? > >Cheers, > >Sean Do you REALLY want to know? (8^)> By customizing the PPD, you can hack around with (1) level of PostScript language used, (2) custom sizes (if any) allowed, (3) what fonts are available (should be nothing other than Courier, really), and (4) whether TrueType fonts are supported natively. For many improperly trained and/or bigoted prepress (alleged) professionals, item (4) is the issue. By modifying a PPD to indicate that there is no Type 42 font rasterizer, the "message" goes back to the driver and/or application (in the case of some Adobe applications) that TrueType fonts must be converted to unhinted Type 1 outlines and/or bitmaps for output. Note that is clearly not a correct PDF workflow! - Dov ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **