[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
Subject: MIF representation of CiteMaker variables
From: Fred Ma <fma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 22:54:15 -0400
References: <frpmgv439fhetie595u2r644ja0e81sd15@4ax.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Please excuse the repost. I pasted the wrong subject line on the first try (and there is no way to cancel the erroneous posting). > From: Stefan Petrucha <petrucha@isnet.sk> > > If you had small smattering of experience with Python, > you could try fmPython (available from my site). With > Python you can avoid the MIF-trip and work directly > from within FM, process whole book at once etc. It > should be sufficient to solve your problems with > citations. > > Drawback: one does need to know a little bit how the FM > internal structures are organized (documentation > available in the FDK) in addition to Python > programming. Stefan, I'm aware that Python is a very good alternative to Perl, but I've already sunk a great deal of time in the past getting to know the small smattering of Perl that I have. Unfortunately, I not familiar with the FM internal book/document file structure, and I don't believe that I have to time to get involved with something new at this point. In fact, I will only spend time on the Perl route if it is absolutely unacceptable to have an disparate lists of references for each chapter. In the proposal, it might be acceptable, but probably not in the final thesis. Thanks for pointng out fmPython as a possibility. It's certainly worthwhile to know of its existence. Fred -- Fred Ma, fma@doe.carleton.ca Carleton University, Dept. of Electronics 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario Canada, K1S 5B6 ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **