Re: FrameMaker Gets a Boost (news item in India Times, Nov. 24)

["Dmitri Yunov" <yudmi@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dov, I'm very like to see that your positive opinion is exactly as my very
good impression of Adobe India programmers and managers.

As I am sure nobody can say InDesign is bad or poor product even if it may
be not for this or that concrete purpose Framemaker is, my reference to
InDesign as a result of  Adobe India was only positive.

It promises to us a good result of FM 8 also.

Dm.




----- Original Message -----
From: "Dov Isaacs" <isaacs@adobe.com>
To: "Dmitri Yunov" <yudmi@star.spb.ru>
Cc: "Framers List" <framers@FrameUsers.com>; "Framers2" <framers@omsys.com>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: FrameMaker Gets a Boost (news item in India Times, Nov. 24)


> For the record, InDesign 1.x and 2.x was developed primarily by
> a development group in Seattle, Washington with major contributions
> from Adobe core technology organizations based both in San Jose and
> India. The Adobe India development organization is a very professional,
> seasoned, and well-managed group with major contributions to a number
> of Adobe products other than just InDesign.
>
>         - Dov
>
>
> At 11/25/2002 11:52 AM, Dmitri Yunov wrote:
> >Some comments..
> >
> >Adobe India department was the main executor of InDesign 1.x and 2
> >successful project so anyone could have a clear idea of how good or bad
> >should be the future FrameMaker 8 release.
> >By the way - as a person who was involved into InDesign beta projects I
have
> >plenty to say the communications with Adobe India root beta coordinators
was
> >much more successful towards the resolution of InDesign 1.x-2.0 problems
> >than I have seeing [here] with Framemaker pre-release/post-release
problems
> >last 6 years.
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >Dm.


** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **