[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: <larry.kollar@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Framers List" <framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Frame XML to HTML Help via XSLT
From: "Glenn Maxey" <glenn.maxey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:17:12 -0600
Cc: <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Thread-Index: AcJC2UcmIhEv9iZsRdeju49qfMg3uAAAI2Lg
Thread-Topic: Frame XML to HTML Help via XSLT
Speaking as a user of Mif2Go, its HTML output is as clean as the source FM. If you are diligent in using FM paragraph/character formats and have configured Mif2Go to use a CSS, then you'll get class information in your generated HTML tags (relating to the FM formats) that the Mif2Go generated CSS can control. Because all our manuals are based on a single style guide, I've only had to generate and tweak the CSS once. If, however, your writers did the Word-thing everywhere of highlighting and clicking "bold", "italic", "underline", etc. (e.g., not using defined formats), you'll get a lot of corresponding HTML tags (e.g., <b>, <i>) that can't be controlled very well with a CSS. In any event, I still find the produced HTML code very clean... clean enough for me to write post-processing perl tools for. (I post-process for other reasons.) Looking at an example, I see only two comments that didn't come from my content or settings that I established for the output generation. I have never seen the bogus tags that seem to overwhelm Word-to-RTF and Word-to-HTML conversions. (With Word and its conversions, it's always a question of "garbage-in, garbage-out." Every notice how bloated its DOC files are? Even a brand-new Word document with no content is 11 KB.) Glenn Maxey Technical Writer Voyant Technologies, Inc. 1765 West 121st Avenue Westminster, CO 80234-2301 Tel. +1 303.223.5164 Fax. +1 303.223.5275 glenn.maxey@voyanttech.com > -----Original Message----- > From: larry.kollar@arrisi.com [mailto:larry.kollar@arrisi.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 8:15 AM > To: Framers List > Cc: framers@omsys.com > Subject: Re: Frame XML to HTML Help via XSLT <snip> > How clean is the HTML that WWP or Mif2Go generate? How > much tweaking is required to produce something close to > valid HTML? This isn't just a pride-of-workmanship issue; > the chance of unpleasant surprises is greater when you're > dealing with sloppy HTML. ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **