[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Candis Condo <candisc@xxxxxxx>, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Reviewers (WAS: Re: Using Word for drafts?)
From: Dennis Hays <dhays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 16:16:43 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <053966D5DF08D411889C009027E3497935F113@cayenne.pcx.ncd.com>
References: <053966D5DF08D411889C009027E3497935F113@cayenne.pcx.ncd.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.7
I agree with Candis. And as a footnote, I always had the SMEs (apologies to Capt. Hook's 1st mate), sign off on the documentation. It seems a signature warrants a closer inspection by them as to content. Quoting Candis Condo <candisc@ncd.com>: > > I too point out that they are the experts on the subject matter -- not I > and > they are responsible for the technical accuracy of the document. That > usually catches their attention. -- Dennis Hays http://www.haysdesign.com ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **