[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Allen Schaaf <soundbyte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Reviewers (WAS: Re: Using Word for drafts?)
From: Bill Gruener <bill.gruener@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 09:31:02 -0700
In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.2.20020622113356.027dce50@pop.sfo.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
Hi All, I couldn't resist commenting on this message. I worked in educational publishing for 25 years, and during that time published 150 books and reviewed 4-10 times as many manuscripts. No matter how many times in how many ways I told reviewers to focus on content, I would always hear, "It doesn't look like a book." Today as a technical writer, I spin PDFs from the compiled/generated Frame file, send to the reviewers, and politely, but quietly, ignore comments about formatting. If need be, I stress to the reviewer that they should focus on the content. This approach seems to work. Not here, but somewhere in the research, there might be some interesting questions to answer as to how much the formatting affects the delivery of the content. Does that have anything to do with they medium is the message. Bill Gruener Technical Writer Schneider Electric North Andover, MA william.gruener@modicon.com > From: Allen Schaaf <soundbyte@sound-by-design.com> > Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 11:43:57 -0700 > To: framers@omsys.com > Subject: Reviewers (WAS: Re: Using Word for drafts?) > > My solution to the reviewers issue is to tell them in a cover letter that > "...this draft is for content and if you see typographical, stylistic, or > grammatical mistakes, please note them and thank you. But please > concentrate your energies on the content you know about because I might > have gotten it wrong." > > This seems to send them in the right direction. And those who love to show > others will concentrate on content to see if, indeed, you have gotten it > wrong. They just glow with pride. > > It's no skin off my nose to make a better manual and if I can give someone > a little cheap pleasure in the process, that's great. > > Allen Schaaf > > > > At 09:05 AM 6/3/02, David Neeley wrote: >> Of course, if *no* reviewer notes you "forgot to italicize the title of >> boox X" and *you* don't notice it, the results can be somewhat embarrassing! >> >> David >> >> >> ------------original message--------------- >> >>> * If the draft authors want final formatting control, they are in the >>> wrong profession. Cogent comments about table formatting relative to data >>> presentation is useful, but 30 tech reviewers telling you that you forgot >>> to italicize the title of book X (and ignoring gross errors of fact) are >>> not. >> >> ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** >> ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** > > > ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** > ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **