[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Richard Combs" <richard.combs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Free Framers \(E-mail\)" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: going with (or against) the flow
From: "Becky Swanson" <becky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 17:55:03 -0500
Cc: "Framers List \(E-mail\)" <framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <DC54934F41633F428DA671D6ECFC7D0F1E19F4@exchange.corp.voyanttech.com>
Reply-To: "Becky Swanson" <becky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
I agree that most tech docs can be done in one flow, and even with one frame per page. One exception to the one-frame rule is when you may have either a one- or two-line chapter title, and you always want the body text to start a set distance from the top of the page. But then you still use the same flow, just split the text frame and have the para that follows the Chapter title set to Start at Top of Column. That takes care of that problem. Multiple flows (auto-connected) can be used when you are laying out a document that has different languages in two columns. For instance, I did some technical marketing materials that had English in the left column, and another language in the right-hand column. Because they were marketing materials (brochures), we stuck the graphics on the page (not anchored) in the middle of the 2 columns with both languages for the callouts. Newsletters, magazines, and the like will often have multiple flows. Templates for these need to be set up with individual text frames for columns, and the frames are generally set with Autoconnect turned off. BTW, flows do not have to be a letter or number, they can be a word. You can use things like "picnic" or "policy" to designate the story that is in the flow. Cheers, Becky Swanson Benchmark Publications Group, Inc. www.benchmarkpubs.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Combs" <richard.combs@voyanttech.com> To: "Free Framers (E-mail)" <framers@omsys.com> Cc: "Framers List (E-mail)" <framers@FrameUsers.com> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 5:01 PM Subject: RE: going with (or against) the flow David Foster [mailto:dfoster@Brixnet.com] wrote: > I have a master page with this (unfortunate) flow, from top to bottom: > > Flow B -- a chapter number > Flow C -- a chapter title > Flow A -- the chapter body <snip> > 3. If not, what's the easiest way out of this mess? To create > a new master > page with the frames in their proper order? David, take heart in the fact that you're not alone. It seems to me that this topic came up more than once recently (on one list or the other), and without a satisfying answer. Various people opined that the creation order of the frames mattered, or that their "front to back" layering order on the page mattered. But it seems to me that each such suggestion was met with "I tried that, and it didn't work." To me, the easiest solution is to _put all the frames into the same flow, and connect them_. Why not? I've never understood what people gain by setting up title pages with multiple flows. For that matter, I suspect most title page layouts can be accomplished with only one _frame_. I assume the paragraph tags for the chapter number and title are used only for those items, so why not define them (and the title page frame itself) to position them where they belong? I've never used more than one flow for anything except a newsletter. Am I just missing something? Richard ------ Richard G. Combs Senior Technical Writer Voyant Technologies, Inc. richardDOTcombs AT voyanttechDOTcom 303-223-5111 ------ rgcombs AT freeDASHmarketDOTnet 303-777-0436 ------ ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **