[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "FrameSGML@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <frameSGML@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Free Framers" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [FrameSGML] Index Building Blocks
From: Dan Emory <danemory@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 10:59:22 -0800
In-Reply-To: <016b01c1c858$36d572c0$d9e585d9@ESTERNOTEBOOK>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
It appears you have found a bug in FM+SGML 6.0 First, I created a test file in FM+SGML 5.5.6, in which I inserted a custom marker type with the identical text that you put into your marker. The resulting generated list of markers properly converted the marker text to: Text1 text2 where text2 had the bold character format applied to it. Next, I opened that same test file in FM+SGML 6.0, and again generated a list of markers. The resulting generated list of markers did not properly convert the marker text, and instead produced: Text1 <Bold> text2 Does anyone know whether Adobe is aware of this very serious bug? At 06:22 PM 3/10/02 +0100, Ester Crisanti wrote: >I have a valid SGML document in FM+SGML. >I insert a marker directly in FM+SGML like this: > >Text 1 <Bold> text 2 > >where Bold is the name of Character Format. > >When I generate the List of Markers I get a LOM file with this entry: >Text 1 <Bold> text 2 > >so the character format is not recognize. >The same procedure in FM works fine. >Do you know why? > ==================== | Nullius in Verba | ==================== Dan Emory, Dan Emory & Associates FrameMaker/FrameMaker+SGML Document Design & Database Publishing Voice/Fax: 949-722-8971 E-Mail: danemory@primenet.com 177 Riverside Ave., STE F, #1151, Newport Beach, CA 92663 ---Subscribe to the "Free Framers" list by sending a message to majordomo@omsys.com with "subscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **