[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ezra Steinberg <ezra@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Free Framers" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Figure numbering out of sequence with floating anchored frames
From: Dan Emory <danemory@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 05:34:30 -0800
In-Reply-To: <01C170EC.31A0D060.esmond.pitt@bigpond.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
At 11:20 AM 11/19/01 +1100, Esmond Pitt wrote: >The problem with Dan Emory's scheme of explicit anchor paragraphs is that you >are forced to make the page-breaking decisions yourself, and you basically >lose the 'Floating' function. There are occasions when I genuinely don't care >which figure appears first, I want Frame to figure it out and lay out the >pages >optimally, and I'd just like the figure numbering to agree. You are absolutely wrong. Nothing in my "scheme" loses the "Floating" function. Specifying At insertion point as the anchoring position denies you the option to turn off floating, because the insertion point itself automatically floats. The description of my method did include a better way to force paragraph breaks, but such breaks are not made because the anchored frames don't float, they're made, for instance, to keep the graphic on the same page as the text which describes it. ==================== | Nullius in Verba | ==================== Dan Emory, Dan Emory & Associates FrameMaker/FrameMaker+SGML Document Design & Database Publishing Voice/Fax: 949-722-8971 E-Mail: danemory@primenet.com 177 Riverside Ave., STE F, #1151, Newport Beach, CA 92663 ---Subscribe to the "Free Framers" list by sending a message to majordomo@omsys.com with "subscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **