[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "'edunn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <edunn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Simpson <Robert_Simpson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Framers@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Replacement pages for user's guides
From: Dowdell Charles <Charles.Dowdell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 11:35:06 -0400
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Change Page packages are a fantastic solution to a true information/cost/value dilemma. Unfortunatly, FrameMaker does not provide the easiest methods of satisfying this need. You must work outside the box a little bit to manage and provide the change page packages. The biggest challenge comes when the change pages are greater in number than what you had a originally, either in a section of a book. Using dashed Section-Page numbers can help a lot. The biggest thing I found to help in this area is to not use the # (Page) character for page numbers. Use a Autonumber string instead. That makes is easier for you to more easily add .1 type numbers for the additional pages. Charlie Dowdell The Raymond Corporation Manager, Technical Publications -----Original Message----- From: edunn@transport.bombardier.com [mailto:edunn@transport.bombardier.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 9:28 AM To: Robert Simpson; Framers@FrameUsers.com; Framers@Omsys.Com Subject: Re: Replacement pages for user's guides While you may be right about some audiences, the practice of change pages makes sense for many audiences and industries. As your post specifically mentions software, I suppose what you say is entirely true about software. But in the aviation, transportation, military, and heavy equipment world, change pages are often the norm, are part of the culture, and are in fact the best solution. "simply sending every customer a completely revised manual" is a ridiculous suggestion if you have to send hundreds (or thousands) of copies of a binder that is thousands in size. Often the changes are of such importance that the information can not wait until the whole manual is re-released. And if the binder is just one of dozens in a manual set, why not have change pages if you are going to have "change binders" anyway? Asking the customer to do your work by monitoring your website instead of doing the wok yourself and notifying them directly, in some conditions will not only lead to loss of customers, but also loss of life of damage to equipment. I would even argue that the practice of change pages is relevant in the software industry for sectors involving large enterprise type installations or complex interdependent systems. Eric L. Dunn Please respond to "Robert Simpson" <Robert_Simpson@quickeagle.com> To: framers@FrameUsers.com (Framers List) Subject: Re: Replacement pages for user's guides I guess that I also would have to ask why you're doing this. The cost is high in terms of the time it takes to keep all the addresses of where to send the pages, packaging, preparation, etc In the research that has been conducted, most replacement pages are not even used by the customers to whom they're sent for many reasons: the pages don't get to the right people, just aren't bothered with, get lost, etc. Remember the loose-leaf software manuals of old? They got out of that business fast! You're lucky to even get a manual today! Many you print yourself from PDF files accessible via websites. I'd suggest simply sending every customer a completely revised manual or, if your customers have internet access, make the information available through a website. In short, exploit the technology that is available to make your life easier in the new millenium. Bob Simspon Quick Eagle Networks Victor, NY ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **