[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Kathy Rainbolt" <rainbolt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Framers@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Incredibly Slow to do ANYTHING in Frame+SGML6 with a large doc
From: edunn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 18:30:13 -0400
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Let's see if I can do this without revealing how little I actually know. <book> <Doc> <Chapter> <Title> text </title> <Para0> <Subpara1> text </Subpara1> </Para0> <Para0> <Subpara1> text </Subpara1> </Para0> </Chapter> <Chapter> </Chapter> ** more than one chapter per doc </Doc> <Doc> </Doc> ** more than one doc per book </book> To the best of my understanding, in this scenario, the FM book components could be: - Entire <Doc> structures - Entire <Chapter> structures - Entire <Para0> structures - Files with just <Title> - Files with just <Subpara1> Any elements that require text must be in a FM file. The remaining/missing structure(s) can be defined in the FM book. Of course the SGML fragments would have to be in such a way that a valid structure is produced. This would also require the definitions in the EDD to allow the various elements to be allowable as highest level for the FM files to validate. But I believe you open a can of worms WRT how FM deals with fragmented SGML. My solution for one document, was to "fudge" the EDD by allowing the equivalent of <subpara> to be allowed as highest element. I then imported the resulting files as text insets into a FM file that had the "official" EDD. This allowed me to work on the documents at a smaller granularity than explicitly allowd and to manage reusable material. Hope this helps and Good Luck Eric L. Dunn (I don't claim to be an expert in all this so I may be completely wrong. Better don my asbestos underoos. ;-)) ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **