[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: <thomas.michanek@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: PDF problem: Acrobat display
From: "Dov Isaacs" <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 03:23:59 -0700
In-Reply-To: <001701c0ce30$bf074290$7cc909c0@tomasmw2k>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010425113933.03476e70@mailsj.corp.adobe.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
You will not get any argument from me that documentation of the color options for Acrobat are at best somewhat sparse. The same is true vis-a-vis Reader versus the full Acrobat product in terms of color management. I assume that you are saying that to produce PDF, you are using PostScript generated for a printer other than one described by the Distiller PPD. This can cause a number of significant problems. Furthermore, I assume that you are claiming that PostScript coming out of the Distiller printer instance is up to six times the size of that coming out of the printer instance for your PostScript "office" printer. This could indeed be true if your driver is grossly misconfigured. For example, the default setting for the Acrobat Distiller printer instance is ASCII. Pure binary (or "binary") can save you up to 50%, depending upon file content. If your Acrobat Distiller printer instance is set for let's say 2400 dpi and your office printer is set for 600 dpi and your document has large numbers of images, all less than 600 dpi in resolution, the PostScript to the Acrobat Distiller printer will have non-EPS images that are 16 times the size of those sent to the office printer in terms of image data. Don't select resolutions higher than you really need!!! FrameMaker resamples the non-EPS images to the drivers' specified device resolution. By the way, another problem with using the PostScript "office printer's" printer instance to generate PostScript is that such instances may in fact have color profiles associated with them or driver plug-ins that DO modify the color coming from the application to the driver and/or generate color-managed PostScript which could contribute to the types of problems you first mention. Lessons: (1) Unless you have workflows that really need it and you have all the tools, planets, and stars lined up right, disable any color management options with FrameMaker and PDF. (2) Always use the Acrobat Distiller printer instance (Windows) or Create Adobe PDF printer (Macintosh) to generate PostScript for distillation. (3) Don't select a device resolution with either of the printer instances described in (2) above that is significantly higher than really needed. Generally speaking, even with prepress needs, 600 dpi is sufficient. - Dov At 4/26/2001 02:10 AM, Thomas Michanek wrote: >> I am going to go out "on a limb" with this one. My gut feel >> is that during distillation, you have some type of color >> management turned on. With FrameMaker documents, you should >> set your Distiller job options to "Leave color unchanged". >> You want NO conversions to managed color since FrameMaker >> doesn't really it and your would otherwise need to change >> the rest of your workflow to support it. * >Thank you, Dov! This was indeed the problem. >Unfortunately, the Acrobat Distiller pre-defined set of job options >called "ScreenOptimized" has the setting to convert all colors to >RGB turned on. This setting is highly recommended by the Distiller >guide for online viewing purposes, and says that the setting "Leave >color unchanged" may be useful for some print shops... (I don't have >the English text). I can find no information at all that this setting >could be useful or necessary for online viewing purposes, for files >originating from FrameMaker or any other application. * >> Acrobat versus Acrobat Reader? Acrobat supports color >> management and looks at that information. Acrobat Reader >> doesn't. > >Interesting. Is this documented somewhere? > >I still wonder why this problem shows in Acrobat 4.05a on >Windows NT, but not on Windows 2000. >Unfortunately, our existing PDF workflow does *not* call for the >Acrobat Distiller printer to be used when producing the PS file for >distilling. Since the problem *goes away* when using our default >office printer instead, it makes it hard to motivate a change >in the workflow... The fact that the intermediate PS files become >6 times larger when using the Acrobat Distiller printer doesn't >help either :-( > >I'd apprciate any further comments, from Dov or anybody else. > > >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >Thomas Michanek, Technical Writer ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **