[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: FrameUsers <Framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Framers <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Telecommuting (was RE: Speaking of layoffs)
From: Thomas Neuburger <thomasn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 09:41:25 -0800
Cc: Lone Writer SIG <stclwrsig-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Hello, An excellent point! From my own experience, managing the sense of presence (not just presence; the sense of presence) is the single most important intangible in the telecommuting equation. Many people forget this. You not only need to be present, you need to *appear* to be present. It's possible to do the first and forget the second; or worse, to do the first and think the second is, well, unreasonable. It's not. IMO, it's a requirement of the situation; very high on the list. Best, Tom Neuburger www.twelfthnight.com On FrameUsers, Lee Richardson wrote: >Subject: Re: Telecommuting (was RE: Speaking of layoffs... >From: "Lee Richardson" <lhr@Adobe.COM> >Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:55:07 -0800 >X-Message-Number: 50 > >You also have to put extra effort into being visible and present. We had >one QA engineer that worked offsite from north of Seattle- he did all of >the above, and included his direct phone number in the sig line of every >email he sent. He then picked up his phone 9 out of every 10 times I >called. I always had a sense he was there and available. > >I also got several second-hand references that he was around- overheard >discussions of bugs he'd written up, references in mtgs to calling him >with questions, such that he had a noticeable virtual presence. > >...Lee ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **