[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: An observation about the list headers
From: jeremy@xxxxxxxxx (Jeremy H. Griffith)
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 00:42:46 GMT
In-Reply-To: <3A83314F.A85EEC6A@infocon.com>
Organization: Omni Systems, Inc.
References: <3A83314F.A85EEC6A@infocon.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 08 Feb 2001 18:52:47 -0500, "Lester C. Smalley" <lsmalley@infocon.com> wrote: >Has anyone else noticed that, when sending to the general list >addres (frameusers@frameusers.com) the TO: and CC: headers are >re-written? > >I notice this especially when I reply to a message posted to >both frameusers and "framers@omsys.com", and the second address >is consistenly missing from the message relayed by frameusers. > >Why is this? Isn't a little healthy competition and the broader >disemmination of questions and answers a good idea? Actually, IIRC, the rewriting was necessary because of a feature of Lyris. Previously, when you sent a post to both lists using CC:, your post went, as desired, to both servers. But then, Lyris (the frameusers listserver software) would itself *also* send to the CC, so if that was framers@omsys.com, *two* copies went there. A Bad Thing. OTOH, Majordomo (the omsys listserver software) just preserved the CC as part of the message, but otherwise ignored it, so there is no problem there requiring the elimination of the extra addresses. This is one of the many times that I have appreciated Brad's quick action, correcting this multi-posting problem. Oh sir, you know well that life is full of infinite absurdities, which, strangely enough, do not even need to appear plausible, since they are true. --Pirandello --Jeremy H. Griffith <postmaster@omsys.com> ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **