[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Framers2" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>, "Framers1" <Framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Future of FrameMaker: InDesign? [Long]
From: "Rick Quatro" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 22:58:46 -0400
Reply-To: "Rick Quatro" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Background: Last year, I used FrameMaker to typeset an entire King James Bible. Frame's running header/footers and book features were extremely helpful, but the text required a lot of manual adjustment to get good character and word spacing, and to control widows and orphans. Drop caps at the beginning of each chapter required considerable work. I had to print from Macintosh FrameMaker because the Windows version doesn't support ligatures. This year, I am typesetting a Spanish Bible, as well as an English/Spanish Bible with each language in parallel columns. I have been taking a hard look at InDesign, mainly because of its claims to an advanced, multi-line type composition engine. In using the Tryout Version, I found that the text control is indeed excellent. InDesign gives a lot of attention to typography; for details, see http://www.adobe.com/products/indesign/pdfs/idsn15typography.pdf. Working with InDesign gives me a sense of what the interface of a modern page layout program should be. Unlimited undos, ruler guides, oversized pasteboard, application- and document-level defaults, layers, native support for Illustrator, Photoshop and PDF, Unicode, paragraph rules, etc. I had honestly hoped that FrameMaker would be "modernized" in Version 6. Frame 6, with the exception of book handling, is pretty much a repackaging of 5.5.6; in short, it is a major disappointment. I think it's a foregone conclusion that FrameMaker will never receive the development it needs to achieve parity with Adobe's mainstream applications. Even in the areas of traditional FrameMaker strength, it is beginning to fall behind. Scripts and plugins can only go so far, because of FrameMaker's "outdated code base." Of course, FrameMaker still has features that InDesign and others don't have (integrated tables, autonumbering, running header/footers, run-in heads, etc.). But, reading this InDesign article about Architecture and Extensibility (http://www.adobe.com/products/indesign/pdfs/idsn15architecture.pdf) has made me consider the future of both products, and guess at Adobe's strategy. If InDesign truly has a modern, object-oriented architecture, perhaps it's easier and more cost-effective to add FrameMaker-like features to InDesign, than to overhaul FrameMaker's code base. After doing some research on InDesign's Software Developers Kit (SDK), this seems like it could be a reasonable strategy. There is no question that InDesign was created with extensibility in mind. For the record: I wish that FrameMaker's future was as bright as it once seemed. Ironically, it was Adobe's purchase of Frame that made me believe that FrameMaker would be propelled to the front of the page layout pack. But, reality has rapidly set in. Regardless of Adobe's spin on FrameMaker (Warnock, et. al.), Frame 6 confirms the classic saying, "actions speak louder than words." Quark's development of XML import/export capability shows that other guys are not going to stand still. My clients are not as loyal to FrameMaker as I am, which means that they are looking elsewhere for solutions also. Questions for Adobe and developers: What is the feasibility of adding some long-document capabilities to InDesign? Are there any plans for doing so? Is it reasonable or realistic to take the best features of FrameMaker and add them to InDesign, perhaps as a set of "Long-Document Plugins"? Are there any developers working on plugins for InDesign that might make it worth the switch, at least for some documents? Fellow Framers: In this post, I am basically "thinking out loud." One thing I learned when I was in the thick of the Macintosh/Windows wars: I had to determine if it was more important to defend the Mac platform to the end, or to stay in business and serve my clients. I chose the latter. Do I stay with Frame to the end, or do I try to provide the best publishing solutions for my clients? I want to do both, but the future is requiring me to start looking beyond FrameMaker. I am interested in your feedback. To start with, I would like to compile a list of indispensible Frame features. Thanks. Rick Quatro Carmen Publishing 716 659-8267 rick@frameexpert.com http://www.frameexpert.com ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **