[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
Subject: Influencing Adobe on FrameMaker
From: HALL Bill <bill.hall@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 07:50:37 +1000
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Re Rachel Bowen's comment as to why all the agony about fears of the "death of Frame", this is quite understandable when your livelihood depends on maintaining mastery of a single proprietary application. The problem is that Adobe is a bit like Microsoft - they are interested in making big profits wherever they can - not in yours or my livelihood. The problem is inherent in tying yourselves to ANY proprietary product. I subscribe to the FM users groups because my company is currently using 5 FM+SGML licenses. However, we are not concerned with whether or not Adobe continues to support the product. SGML is a non-proprietary standard format, and we have already verified that our data management system and authors are equally happy to work with ArborText's Adept/Epic Editor or SoftQuad's XMetaL. You don't even need to use the same brand of systems for formatting and delivery as you do for authoring. Whatever tools we use for authoring, we will probably continue to use our existing FM+SGML for the printed page - until something better comes along. The bottom line is that if you produce large volumes of standardised documents (as most tech writers and tech doc companies or departments do) you should probably be working towards standardising on doing your work as SGML or XML. Yes, there is a cost to design DTDs and convert data, but we have found this is valuable exercise in its own right because we have a much better understanding of how our documents should be structured logically, and have consequently improved the quality of our products. Once your data is in a standard markup format, you are substantially protected from the vagaries of application providers. The application becomes a commodity like a PC. You go with whoever is offering the best deal at the time. If one supplier ceases to support their product it is actually quite easy to shift to another. No more application holy wars! Where FrameMaker is concerned, we will continue to maintain our existing licenses, but at this particular point in time, if we need to add authoring stations beyond the existing five, we would probably go with Epic or XMetaL, with no problems running these in parallel with the existing FM+SGML stations. Tomorrow, it might be some product that we haven't seen yet. The bottom line is that SGML and XML standards will sooner or later bring real competition back into the marketplace for knowledge capture systems. The big loser will be Microsoft, because once XML becomes the primary medium for exchanging information electronically (rather than MS Word and paper documents) they will have to compete on an equal footing with everyone else. Adobe is also at risk from this revolution. As more people standardise on markup languages, and browsers understand these better, there will be less call for paper-oriented applications like Acrobat and Adobe's DTP tools. .PDF is a very bad format for the dynamic production and speedy display of information (and is virtually unreadable on many Web sites) and is useless for content management. It will be a long time before we are totally paperless, but I would start thinking about selling your shares in paper manufacturers and printers. This should also concern Adobe, and perhaps encourage them to put more effort into supporting FM as their SGML/XML flagship. FrameMaker is a very good bridging tool between the paper and content oriented authoring paradigms, and if Adobe exploited this effectively, they could benefit at Microsoft's expense, but again - if they don't, there is no need for loyalty to either Microsoft or Adobe if you have already made the shift to structured authoring yourselves. And yes, once you have moved your content to a standard markup format, you can concentrate on writing documents and forget about whether or not a particular application is properly supported. Bill Hall Documentation Systems Specialist Integrated Logistic Support Naval Projects and Support Tenix Defence Systems Pty Ltd Williamstown, Vic. 3016 AUSTRALIA Email: bill.hall@tenix.com ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **