[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: stpats@xxxxxxxx, Steve Read <stephenread@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Free Framers" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Not Technical Enough
From: Dan Emory <danemory@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2000 18:29:49 -0700
Cc: wjgage@xxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <3936BDEF.A7A2957C@storm.ca>
References: <NEBBKNPPKLEJFIDDFFOEOEPLCAAA.stephenread@earthlink.net>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
In response to Sarah O'Keefe's polarizing statement that English Lit majors were better at tech writing that those with a technical background, I rose to the bait and predicted that, in the next economic downturn, for "obvious reasons" The English Lit majors will be out on the street, wishing they'd settled for an academic sinecure or editing position. If my prediction turns out to be true, it would demonstrate that O'Keefe's premise is mistaken. William Gage, Steve Read, et al begged to differ on the grounds that they were Lit majors, and have had long careers as tech writers. If any of them had ever taken an academic course in Statistics, they'd know that such anecdotal evidence is meaningless. My prediction is based on the likelihood that what has happened in the past will happen again, given the same conditions (that at least is what a History major would argue). Stephen Martin interpreted my (originally terse) comments correctly. Since I am being flamed from all corners, I am posting his and my reply to the lists. ============================================== At 03:47 PM 6/1/00 -0400, Stephen Martin wrote: >-------------------------------Snip----------------------- >Remember, gentlemen, at this point the conversation is about the recent >glut of writers. ----------------------------------------Snip---------------- >To paraphrase Dan: > >When push comes to shove, the fresh faced Lit grads will be put out in >the street in favour of those who bring the value of experience to the >job. >================================================== I'd prefer to say that, when push comes to shove, good writers with a solid technical background will be kept, and good writers without that kind of background will be laid off. The fact is that there are one heck of a lot of successful authors who never went beyond the basic English classes we all took. They, presumably, "got it" better than most pupils, but most likely, they also developed their salable skills through diligent practice, not college courses. Successful writers will tell you most of their skills were self-taught. It's also true that most people who are reasonably well grounded in basic English can, through reading and practice, greatly improve their writing skills. But there is no equivalently straightforward way to improve your technical skills without some kind of academic grounding in science, mathematics, and engineering. I think it's true that most English Lit majors drop mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc. at the earliest possible point in their academic careers, and shy away from subjects such as statistics. A newly graduated English Lit major who gets a tech writing job when there's a scarcity of qualified ones can, if they're reasonably intelligent, pick up enough technical knowledge about his/her company's product line to become a proficient tech writer for that company's products. But that is not the kind of broad technical proficiency one needs to survive in this business. So, when they leave that first company, either voluntarily or through layoff, they expect to find a more senior position at a better salary. If the company they apply to is in an entirely different kind of business, their narrowly based technical knowledge about a particular product counts for nought, and their lack of any significant academic grounding or experience in technical subjects is likely to disqualify them. Thus, as I predicted, they're likely to find themselves "out on the street" with few prospects for jobs in their chosen profession. In my career, I have written every sort of technical manual on every kind of thing imaginable from 4-story-high nuclear reactor pumps to 4-story high ICBMs, plus Air Defense Systems, Military Command Control Communications Systems, Satellite Communications Systems, computer hardware, computer software, microwave spectrum analyzers, medical diagnostic equipment, car washes, and a tortilla making machine that produced 10,000 tortillas an hour. Without a firm academic grounding in science, mathematics, and engineering, coupled with a few years of hands-on experience as a technician in the military and in a technology lab, I couldn't have done it. Almost anyone can get a job in a hot market, but survival over the long term as an Engineering Writer during good times and bad requires a broad technical background. If you don't start out with that kind of background, but are lucky enough to stay employed until you acquire it through working on diverse projects for different employers, then your long-term success may be doubly sweet. But I'll settle for the easier way: Get technically grounded first. ==================== | Nullius in Verba | ==================== Dan Emory, Dan Emory & Associates FrameMaker/FrameMaker+SGML Document Design & Database Publishing Voice/Fax: 949-722-8971 E-Mail: danemory@primenet.com 10044 Adams Ave. #208, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 ---Subscribe to the "Free Framers" list by sending a message to majordomo@omsys.com with "subscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **