RE: Continuation in numbered procedures

[Mike Tatro <tatro@xxxxxxx>]

Heidi-

My solution to this problem is to do the opposite: include an explicit
"complete" step at the end of each procedure. 

This may seem like overkill, but if someone photocopies one of my procedures
there is never any doubt whether they have all the pages and when they are
truly "done."

Warmest Regards,
Michael L. Tatro
Documentation Manager
V-Systems, Inc.
tatro@vsi.com 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rosin, Heidi [mailto:Heidi.Rosin@gateway.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 8:09 AM
> To: 'framers@omsys.com'
> Subject: Continuation in numbered procedures
> 
> 
> Have a question for y'all. We use FM 5.0...soon to upgrade to 
> 6.0. We are
> finding that we need some method to let users know that they need to
> continue on in a numbered procedure. However, we cannot hard code in a
> "Cont.", because our manuals are translated into several 
> different languages
> and the step may end up with a "Cont." in the middle of a 
> page. I know you
> can do a Con't. in a table but that will not work for us either. Does
> anybody out there know a way to accomplish this that would 
> meet our US and
> overseas needs?
> 
> TIA
> 
> Heidi Rosin
> Information Developer
> Human Factors Engineering
> Gateway, Inc.
> 605.232.2874  (x22874)
> Heidi.Rosin@Gateway.com
> 
> 
> 
> ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
> ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **
> 

** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **