[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Framers" <framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Free Framers" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Adobe + FrameMaker
From: "Stuart Burnfield" <stuartb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 11:57:05 +0800
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <LYRIS-28220-7177-2000.05.26-08.06.00--stuartb#tpg.com.au@lists.frameusers.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
> A "MegaTool" can be VERY good at one thing; and "OmniTool" can do a > lot of things, but makes no promises as to how well. An "ÜberTool" > is excellent at all things. No-one (apart from an Australian cricketer) can be excellent at all things, and nor should they try to be. Frame should decide what it wants to be in the next few years and strive to be excellent at that. Frame is a merely adequate word processor, for example, but if there has to be a choice about where the development resources go, I'd rather it went into beefing up Frame's credentials for complex multi- purpose documents. As 'Danny the E' said yesterday in an interesting post over on the Free Framers list, Frame's own future may be to wither away while an ever-improving FrameMaker+SGML becomes the mainstream product. If Frame is to be Über-anything, I hope it's an ÜberFrameMaker+XML. > I wonder what they pay Übermenschen these days, anyway? pay peanuts, get Übermonkeys Regards --- Stuart Burnfield Gentoo Communications mailto:stuartb@tpg.com.au ========= Personal List Subscription Information ========= You are currently subscribed to framers as: stuartb@tpg.com.au To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-framers-28220C@lists.frameusers.com Send administrative questions to listadmin@FrameUsers.com. Visit the FrameUsers website: http://www.FrameUsers.com ========================================================== ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **