[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: FrameUsers <framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, FreeFramers <framers@xxxxxxxxx>, acrobat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: O Adobe, Adobe! What a heartbreak company you are!
From: Hedley Finger <hedley.finger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 09:17:08 +1000
CC: isaacs@xxxxxxxxx, mhilton@xxxxxxxxx, lhr@xxxxxxxxx
Organization: Ericsson Australia Pty Ltd
Reply-To: hedley.finger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Fellow Framers: Yesterday I received a neat little marketing reference from Adobe Systems Pty Ltd, Australia, called the Big Red Folder. It's an approximately A5-sized ring binder containing one card for (almost) each of Adobe's publishing, printing, and graphics arts products. Guess which major product line optimized for producing and publishing long multi-chapter books is not included? Why do they continually do this? I taxed an Adobe person about the persistent failure to include FrameMaker in their product-line promotions and received the answer that FrameMaker addresses a completely different market (from what other markets?). But this weenie couldn't tell me what this other market was or really what markets were addressed by the other products. He clearly was echoing some kind of internal market-segmentation bumf without really understanding who constituted the various markets. There is some kind of corporate culture that assumes that FrameMaker is only used by propeller-cap technical-writing nerds like you and me, and that we live in a PhotoShop- and Illustrator- free ghetto. The fact is that at this corporation (I speak from observation, not on their behalf), FrameMaker is the cross-platform product mandated for producing internal technical documents and end-user documentation, that is books. The technical writers also use Photoshop and Illustrator. The marketing people use GoLive! and Photoshop, and a page layout program, possibly Quark Xpress, to produce everything else. But I also know that a number of commercial book publishers like Jacaranda Wiley and HarperCollins, and many university presses use FrameMaker -- alongside InDesign, PageMaker, and Xpress -- to produce long books, course handbooks, learned works, and so on. Is the marketing strategy to remain silent on FrameMaker for these markets lest the impact of the Quark-killing InDesign thrust be diluted? This seems strange when Adobe's Web site itself promotes a large book publisher who uses FrameMaker. Why isn't there a Publishing Pack that includes BOTH InDesign and FrameMaker? Or alternative Publishing Packs? Are the marketing people frightened that any admission that another Adobe product might be better for SOME publishing tasks than InDesign will somehow harm the perception of that product in the marketplace? God knows FM is terribly deficient in layout and prepress -- for one thing, why can't we lay out pages in double-spreads, with landscape illustrations and tables across two FACING pages? Why does Adobe continually leave FrameMaker pitted against Word as though they are in the same market? There are so many markets where neither Word nor InDesign are appropriate. Or is this yet another case of a product being taken over by a corporate culture, historically aligned with the <prejudice> pony-tailed yuppie graphic-designer set </prejudice>, unable to come to grips with it and from that point it slowly languishes and dies. Symantec have been quite good at killing acquisitions by benign neglect. Or is this a case of predicting the future by examining the past? Fact: few graphic designers in book publishing use FrameMaker. Ergo: graphic designers will never buy FrameMaker. Imagine if Edwin Land had surveyed the market for instant cameras before marketing the Polaroid camera and film. Amongst professional portrait photographers, there was no-one using instant cameras. Newspaper and magazine photographers similarly did not use instant cameras. Scientific, technical, and astronomical photographers did not use instant cameras either. And instant cameras were totally unknown among amateur and home photographers. Ergo: there was no market for instant cameras. -- Regards, Hedley Finger Technical Writer [FrameMaker 5.5.6, Acrobat 3.02, Windows 98, HP OmniBook 2100] SUBSCRIBE TO THE ALTERNATIVE FRAMERS LIST Message must consist of only this text (no signature, etc.): subscribe framers <your@preferred.mail.address> help end Send above message to: <mailto:majordomo@omsys.com?Subject=subscribe%20framers> Ericsson Australia Pty Ltd Tel. +61 3 9301 6214 Cell. +61 412 461 558 Fax. +61 3 9301 6199 Email. hedley.finger@ericsson.com.au Hand Holding Projects Pty Ltd Tel. +61 3 9809 1229 Cell. +61 412 461 558 Fax. +61 3 9809 1326 Email. hfinger@handholding.com.au ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **