[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Framers" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re[2]: two tables--similar information
From: Rick.Henkel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:25:15 -0500
cc: "Thomas Michanek" <thomas.michanek@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
<Someone suggested using text insets from another document containing <the table, but that would only work if the complete table is identical <in the two places. You seem to indicate that only two COLUMNS are <identical, so you cannot use text insets in that case (to my <knowledge). That's what I thought. If I did the text insets, I could set the reference to manually update. But I'd still need to reformat and sort the table. <Unless you can organize the tables and the information in some other <way (split the table, convert columns to rows, or some such), I think <that cross-references is the easiest solution. However, they will <show up as links in HTML and PDF... Beware that table-sorting has a <bug that sometimes deletes all markers included in the text cells! Oh! I'd forgotten about the table-sorting bug. Looks like the cross-references may be the best way to go. Thanks all. rick =========================================================================== ===== Any opinions expressed here are mine and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of First Data. =========================================================================== ===== ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **