[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: <edunn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Framers@xxxxxxxxx" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Alternatives to Frame? (long)
From: "Mark Barratt" <markb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 22:52:01 -0000
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <852568A3.00764FC6.00@btg_hub01.bombardier.com>
Reply-To: <markb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Hi Eric > 1. What is lacking for FM+SGML to round-trip XML? Not much, which is why it's enraging: mostly the ability to read the XML declaration and accept an XML-declared DTD or schema for validation. The character set is a problem up to a point, but FM will write XML in the ISO-8859-1 character set (the one most people seem to use after ASCII in XML), so it should be able to read it back in. In a stable production environment this is not too big a deal: you can write a filter to turn the XML into Frame-compliant SGML. You can use something like XMLAuthority to convert the XML DTD into an SGML DTD, but it adds complexity and error-proneness... > 2. Does anybody support Unicode yet? Frame's character set is odd > though... Well, Windows does at the OS level (NT and 2000 properly), NetWare does, Mac is coming. In the doc game nobody else does much (it's in the next Interleaf) yet. It'll be everywhere in the next year or so. The reason for being agitated is that putting Unicode support into Frame is likely a major piece of surgery. If it ain't done now, the next opportunity is the next major release, which is, 2-3 years away? > 3. What's a 'TEX-algorithm H&J'? Sorry to be obscure. The type 'composing engine' that's in InDesign does very very nice typesetting by, among other things, considering a group of lines rather than a single line when working out where to break words in justified setting. TEX is composition software widely used in math and science publishing which does this. Donald Knuth, who wrote TEX and put it in the public domain, believes InDesign uses the TEX H&J (hyphenation & justification) algorithms. FrameMaker is currently not a typographer's delight. > 3. What does FM lack in PostScript printing? Doesn't printing to > file using the > Distiller driver work? Up to a point. Our experience is that getting high-end colour repro out of Frame is impossible from Windows and possible-but-awkward on Mac. Even there, it takes a lot of trial and error. Having got the situation under control, you need to freeze it because the PostScript you get depends on the driver you're using. The imaging devices that printers (people) use are a lot more sensitive to 'error' than the stuff in offices. > 4. Master pages mapped to paratags exists as a FrameScript, an FDK plugin > shouldn't be hard for both paratags and elements. Really? I'm obviously not paying attention. Where can I find this FrameScript? Thanks for the acute questions. Mark Barratt Text Matters phone +44 (0)118 986 8313 fax +44 (0)118 931 3743 email markb@textmatters.com web http://www.textmatters.com ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **