[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: framers@xxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Problematic mechanical dysfunctionality
From: jeremy@xxxxxxxxx (Jeremy H. Griffith)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 01:19:01 GMT
Organization: Omni Systems, Inc.
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:19:21 -0800, "Lyris" <lyris@lists.frameusers.com> wrote: So this just came back to me from my previous post, in response to Jay's censored post... >Dear Listmember, > >This is an automatic response. We try to keep the discussions on the lists >at FrameUsers.com on topic. Your post was rejected because it was off >topic according to the subject line of your post or you sent a "t*st" >message to the list. > >Please don't post off topic messages to the list. > >Thank You, > >Brad Anderson >FrameUsers.com List Management And that is the message Jay must be referring to. Interestingly, it came back to me within a minute of posting to both lists. In the same batch, Lyris sent a message posted by Deborah Snavely about 2.5 hours earlier. Does anyone else think these priorities are just a bit skewed? And does the automated rejection of posts as off-topic by a machine seem even worse? Even downright uncivil? Grumph. -- Jeremy H. Griffith, at Omni Systems Inc. (jeremy@omsys.com) http://www.omsys.com/ ** To subscribe to Free Framers, email the message ** ** body "subscribe framers" to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **