[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
Subject: RE: OT: Monitor sizes
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:12:24 -0800
Cc: "'Dov Isaacs'" <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Framers List'" <framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
In-reply-to: <000401c3f04c$3c410260$2815c218@BILL>
References: <LYRIS-148086-584223-2004.02.10-18.42.24--wswallow#nycap.rr.com@lists.FrameUsers.com><000401c3f04c$3c410260$2815c218@BILL>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
At 2/10/2004 07:07 PM, Bill Swallow wrote:
>::: (1) No less than 17" LCD monitor at 1280x1024 native resolution.
>::: Better yet, 20" or more at 1600x1200 native resolution. This
>::: week, Dell has had a sale on such an 20" LCD monitor for $899.
>::: I bought two for home.
>
>LOL! And here I am writing a reply from my 15" UltraSharp laptop display at
>1600x1200... LOL!!! I gues I have damn good eyes. ;)
>
>Bill Swallow
>wswallow "at" nycap "dot" rr "dot" com
So am I (from an IBM ThinkPad A21p about to be replaced with an R50p
with a similar screen), and it is great for mobile use IF you know how
to properly configure Windows. But I have good vision, special glasses
for use with this laptop computer, and I would NEVER subject a writer
to this as their "main" display.
- Dov
** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **