[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Fred Ma <fma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Rumour: FM really is dead
From: Bill Briggs <web@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:11:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3FCFE784.5587904B@doe.carleton.ca>
References: <16lusv86vdf4kqop2u37hoq95osllc0l5a@4ax.com><3FCFE784.5587904B@doe.carleton.ca>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
At 9:03 PM -0500 04/12/03, Fred Ma wrote: > >The baffling thing is that Adobe doesn't consider FM >worthwhile. How can that be? We live in a capitalist >environment. There is no product (that I know of, not >that I'm any final authority) that even begins to >rival FM for technical composition. I've wondered that myself. We have all seen the list of corporate clients, including IBM, Boeing, Apple, the Pentagon, Nortel (used to have 25,000 seats licenced when I worked there) and many others. How can it not be a money maker? After the demise of Interleaf there is no competition. Word is a joke. With Unicode support for FrameMaker it would be a no brainer. I just don't understand Adobe's thinking. Maybe it's an old code base, but the future is much longer, and owning this particular market has to be worth money. - web ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **