[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Problems with FM 6.0 installation
From: "Thomas Michanek" <thomas.michanek@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 20:27:42 +0100
Cc: <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030107094710.02140e80@mailsj.corp.adobe.com>
Reply-To: "Thomas Michanek" <thomas.michanek@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
From: "Dov Isaacs" <isaacs@Adobe.COM> > There are no known problems of FrameMaker, any version, with > ATM under any version of Windows. Hmm... but you (Dov) have said earlier (July 2002): "Under NO condition should you ever install any version of ATM 4.0 (or earlier) on Windows 2000 or XP, unless you like totally reinstalling Windows!" Do you mean that ATM 4.0 is such an old version that you don't think it's worth mentioning, or has current versions of Windows 2000/XP overcome the problems with ATM 4.0? > In particular, for Windows 2000 > and XP, all font handling is actually done by the operating system. > ATM simply serves as a front-end to that font handling system But isn't ATM necessary for correct handling of Multiple Master fonts, even on Windows 2000/XP? Thanks for any clarification you can make. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Thomas Michanek, FrameMaker/UNIX/MIF expert Technical Writer, Uppsala, Sweden mailto:Thomas.Michanek@telia.com http://go.to/framers/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **