[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Sean Brierley <seanb_us@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: re: super computer
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 13:06:14 -0800
Cc: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <LISTMANAGER-25396-9350-2002.12.03-13.55.55--isaacs#adobe.com@lists.FrameUsers.com>
References: <LISTMANAGER-35290-9345-2002.12.03-13.51.14--seanb_us#yahoo.com@lists.FrameUsers.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Yes, I was being facetious! FrameMaker gains little from "hot cards" other than in the ability of the system to paint images into the video memory faster. Very little of the graphics that would be displayed in FrameMaker are of a nature that GDI can take advantage of any special graphic card features. Obviously, CAD/CAM, 3D, and other special rendering software can and does attempt to take advantage of graphic card acceleration features. Photoshop in fact takes very little advantage of such features as most of its display function is simply plastering pre-built image to screen. To whatever degree a video card accelerates that access, Photoshop or any other application displaying images gets a "win." - Dov At 12/3/2002 12:55 PM, Sean Brierley wrote: >I dunno. Some of the CAD/CAM stuff I've had to deal >with and OpenGL 3D images seem to benefit from having >a quick card. > >As does Photoshop. > >Stability is my main pursuit in getting a video card, >though. I like my Matrox G550. > >Cheers, > >Sean > >--- Dov Isaacs <isaacs@adobe.com> wrote: >> Buys you precious little unless you are playing >> games! (8^)> >> >> Disk and/or network speed are critical when dealing >> with extensive >> referenced graphics. >> >> - Dov ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **